Overview
Overview
The ZIL-135 is a Soviet 8×8 amphibious heavy truck developed in the late 1950s as a multi-purpose tactical vehicle platform. Its most famous application was as the basis for the BM-27 "Uragan" multiple rocket launcher and various tactical missile transporter-erector-launchers (TELs). The unconventional design featured two separate engines powering independent axle pairs, exceptional off-road mobility, and amphibious capability without preparation.
Historical context
Development began in 1956 at ZIL (Zavod imeni Likhachyova - Likhachev Plant) under chief designer Vital Grachev to create a heavy cross-country vehicle for strategic missile systems. The unique twin-engine configuration emerged from requirements for redundancy and ability to continue operations if one engine failed—critical for nuclear missile launchers requiring high reliability.
The first prototype ZIL-135K appeared in 1959, with production variants entering service in 1961. Unlike conventional military trucks using a single large engine, the ZIL-135 employed two ZIL-375 V8 gasoline engines—one powering the front four wheels, the other driving the rear four. This unusual arrangement provided exceptional mobility and fail-safe operation.
The platform proved so successful that numerous variants served as bases for tactical ballistic missiles (SS-1 "Scud", SS-21 "Scarab"), cruise missiles, and multiple rocket launchers throughout the Cold War.
Specifications
Commonly cited specifications (ZIL-135L baseline cargo carrier):
Dimensions:
- Length: 9.27 m (30 ft 5 in)
- Width: 2.80 m (9 ft 2 in)
- Height: 2.68 m (8 ft 10 in)
- Wheelbase: 1.60 + 1.60 + 1.60 + 1.60 m (equal spacing, 4 axles)
- Ground clearance: 0.48 m (19 in)
Weights:
- Curb weight: 13,650 kg (30,093 lb)
- GVW: 20,000 kg (44,092 lb) cargo variant
- Payload: 6,500 kg (14,330 lb) on road, 4,500 kg (9,921 lb) off-road
Powerplant:
- Engines: 2 × ZIL-375 V8 gasoline engines (air-cooled)
- Power: 180 hp (134 kW) each at 3,200 rpm (360 hp total)
- Displacement: 7.0 L (427 cu in) per engine
- Fuel capacity: 710 L (188 gal) total
- Transmission: Each engine drives one axle pair via hydromechanical transmission
Performance:
- Maximum speed: 65 km/h (40 mph) on road
- Water speed: 5-6 km/h (3-4 mph) using wheels for propulsion
- Range: 500 km (311 mi) on road
- Fuel consumption: 140 L/100 km (1.7 mpg)
- Gradient: 60% (31°)
- Side slope: 30% (17°)
- Fording: Amphibious without preparation
- Trench crossing: 2.5 m (8 ft 2 in)
Drivetrain:
- Configuration: 8×8 all-wheel drive with independent front/rear powerpacks
- Steering: All-wheel steering (8 wheels turn for minimum turning radius)
- Tire pressure regulation: Centralized system adjustable 0.5-3.5 kg/cm²
- Suspension: Independent on all wheels with hydropneumatic shock absorbers
Crew:
- Complement: 2 (driver, vehicle commander) + mission-specific crew
Design characteristics
Twin-engine configuration
The ZIL-135's defining feature was its unusual dual powerplant:
Front powerpack: ZIL-375 engine driving axles 1 and 2 via hydromechanical transmission
Rear powerpack: Separate ZIL-375 engine driving axles 3 and 4 via independent transmission
Advantages:
- Redundancy: Vehicle could continue on one engine if the other failed (reduced speed/load capacity)
- Traction distribution: Power delivered to all eight wheels independently optimized for soft terrain
- Thermal management: Two smaller engines easier to cool than single large engine in compact chassis
- Maintenance: Engine replacement/repair simpler with modular powerpacks
Disadvantages:
- Fuel consumption: 140 L/100 km extremely high (two gasoline engines)
- Complexity: Two complete powertrains increased parts count
- Synchronization: Driver had to manage throttle for both engines (later models automated)
All-wheel steering
All eight wheels could steer, providing exceptional maneuverability:
Normal steering: Front and rear wheels turn in same direction (conventional)
Crab steering: All wheels turn simultaneously at same angle for lateral movement
Counter-steering: Front and rear wheels turn opposite directions for minimal turning radius (10 m)
This system allowed the ZIL-135 to position missile launchers precisely on rough terrain.
Amphibious capability
Water entry: Bilge pumps activate automatically, trim vane (folded on bow) deploys
Propulsion: Wheel rotation provides forward thrust (no dedicated propellers)
Freeboard: High body provides buoyancy for 20-ton loads
Limitations: Calm water only, 5-6 km/h speed, vulnerable to waves/currents
Cab design
Forward control: Driver positioned ahead of front axle for visibility
Side-by-side seating: Driver (left), commander/co-driver (right)
Large windows: Exceptional visibility for precise positioning of missile systems
Spartan interior: Minimal comfort, designed for tactical mobility not long-distance transport
Variants and missile applications
Base vehicle variants
ZIL-135K: Initial production cargo carrier (1961-1965)
ZIL-135L: Improved cargo variant with upgraded hydropneumatic suspension (1965+)
ZIL-135LM: Modernized version with synchronized engine controls (1970s)
ZIL-135E: Export variant with simplified systems
Tactical ballistic missile TELs
2P16 "Luna-M" (FROG-7): Transporter-erector-launcher for 9M21 tactical rocket (70 km range)
9P113 "Luna-M": Later FROG-7 variant with improved fire control
9P117 "Scud-B" (early): Some SS-1C "Scud-B" launchers used ZIL-135 chassis before MAZ-543 adoption
Multiple rocket launchers
BM-27 "Uragan": 16-tube 220 mm rocket launcher (most famous ZIL-135 application)
- Range: 35 km standard, 90 km extended-range rockets
- Warhead: HE-frag, cluster munitions, mines, chemical (historical)
- Reload time: 20 minutes with reload vehicle
9P140 "Uragan-1M": Improved BM-27 with digital fire control
Surface-to-air missiles
9A33BM2 "Osa-AKM" (SA-8 "Gecko"): Some early SA-8 variants used ZIL-135 chassis (later BAZ-5937)
Cruise missile systems
Experimental cruise missile TELs: Test platforms for land-attack cruise missiles (1970s-1980s)
Operational deployment
Service timeline
- 1959: First ZIL-135K prototype
- 1961: Production begins, initial deployment with Rocket Forces
- 1965: BM-27 "Uragan" MLRS enters service on ZIL-135LM chassis
- 1970s: Peak deployment with Soviet Army rocket brigades and divisions
- 1977: BM-27 first combat use (Ogaden War, Ethiopian forces)
- 1979-1989: Afghanistan War, BM-27 extensive use
- 1990s: Post-Soviet conflicts (Chechnya, Nagorno-Karabakh)
- 2000s-present: Continued service with Russian Army, widespread export
Global operators
Military: Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan, Armenia, Uzbekistan, Iraq, Syria, Libya, Algeria, Angola, Ethiopia, Eritrea, Yemen
BM-27 "Uragan" particularly widespread: 50+ countries operated or still operate the system
Combat record
1977 Ogaden War: Ethiopian BM-27s used in artillery barrages against Somali forces
1980s Afghanistan: Soviet rocket artillery including BM-27 on ZIL-135 chassis in bombardment missions
1991 Gulf War: Iraqi BM-27s engaged Coalition forces (many destroyed by air strikes)
1994-1996 First Chechen War: Russian Army BM-27 employment in Grozny siege
2008 Russo-Georgian War: Russian rocket artillery including "Uragan" systems
2014-2022 Ukraine conflicts: Extensive BM-27 use by both sides
Strengths and limitations
Advantages
Exceptional mobility: 8×8 drivetrain with all-wheel steering enabled operation in swamps, forests, snow
Redundancy: Twin-engine design allowed continued operation if one powerplant failed
Amphibious: Cross rivers without bridging or ferries
Low ground pressure: Wide tires and 8-wheel configuration minimized sinking in soft terrain
Versatility: Platform adapted for numerous weapon systems
Strategic mobility: Self-propelled, no separate tractor required
Limitations
Fuel consumption: 140 L/100 km made operational range very limited (500 km maximum)
Gasoline engines: Fire hazard compared to diesel, especially for missile carriers
Mechanical complexity: Twin powertrain required skilled maintenance
Speed: 65 km/h maximum limited strategic mobility
Comfort: Harsh ride, minimal crew amenities for long operations
Obsolescence: 1960s technology; modern replacements offer better efficiency
Comparison with contemporaries
vs. MAZ-543 (Soviet): MAZ-543 had single 525 hp diesel (better range, lower fuel consumption), but ZIL-135 better off-road mobility and redundancy
vs. HEMTT (USA, 1980s): American 8×8 tactical truck more fuel-efficient (diesel), modular design, but no amphibious capability
vs. MAN KAT 8×8 (Germany): Similar role, diesel power, superior crew ergonomics; ZIL-135 more rugged for extreme terrain
Legacy
The ZIL-135 proved the viability of twin-engine heavy tactical vehicles, influencing subsequent Soviet designs including the BAZ-6944 and later MZKT wheeled platforms. The BM-27 "Uragan" remains one of the most successful multiple rocket launcher systems, with thousands still operational worldwide.
The unique all-wheel steering system was adopted by later heavy military trucks including the MAZ-79xx super-heavy transporter family.
Despite obsolescence in Russian service (replaced by more modern platforms), hundreds of ZIL-135-based systems remain operational with export customers as of 2020s due to robust mechanical design and ease of field maintenance.
Several ZIL-135 vehicles are preserved in military museums including the Central Armed Forces Museum in Moscow.
Related equipment
- MAZ-543 missile transporter — Competitor platform
- ZIL-3906 amphibious vehicle — Related ZIL extreme mobility design
- 9K72 "Elbrus" (SS-1 Scud) — Tactical missile on ZIL-135 chassis
Related sections
- Soviet vehicle designation — Understanding naming systems
- Legion library — Equipment reference home
Technical glossary
TEL (Transporter Erector Launcher) : Combined vehicle transporting, raising to firing position, and launching missiles without separate equipment
Hydromechanical transmission : Gearbox combining hydraulic torque converter with mechanical gears for smooth power delivery
All-wheel steering : System allowing all wheels to turn for enhanced maneuverability and minimal turning radius
Centralized tire inflation system : Driver-controlled air pressure adjustment optimizing traction for terrain type
Amphibious capability : Ability to cross water obstacles without preparation using vehicle buoyancy and propulsion